Editorial Type: review-article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 07 Nov 2025

Preventive methods for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws in Implant Dentistry: A scoping review

DDS, MSc, PhD,
DDS, MSc, PhD,
DDS, MS, PhD,
DDS, MSc,
DDS, MSc PhD, and
DDS, MSc PhD
Article Category: Review Article
DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00155
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) is a pathology related to invasive dental procedures or an inflammatory process unrelated to invasive dental procedures. This review aimed to answer the research question: What are the preventive methods for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in Implant Dentistry? This scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute method, PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). An electronic literature search was conducted up to April 2024 in MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, Web of Science, and Embase. The grey literature screening was done in OpenGrey, Google Scholar, and ProQuest, and a qualitative analysis was conducted. Out of 3800 studies identified, 26 were included (15 case reports, three case series, five retrospectives, three prospective). Eleven studies reported MRONJ cases. The preventive method reported were: antiresorptive/antiangiogenic medication suspension (n = 17), antibiotic prophylaxis (n = 22), CTX test (n = 10), plasma rich on factor growth (PRGF) (n = 3), platelet rich in fibrin (PRF) (n = 1), antimicrobial dynamic phototherapy (a-PDT) (n = 2), diode laser (n = 1), and ozone therapy (n = 1). Preventive strategies for MRONJ in Implant Dentistry remain inconclusive. However, a-PDT and PRGF have shown potential as promising methods.

Copyright: 2025

Contributor Notes

Corresponding author: Full Name: Gustavo Faria Cerqueira E-mail address: gfariace@buffalo.edu Full postal address: Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University at Buffalo School of Dental Medicine, 3435 Main St, Squire Hall, Buffalo, NY, USA 14214. Phone Number: +1 716 709 1794

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • Download PDF