Editorial Type: research-article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 07 Nov 2025

Alveolar ridge preservation using a composite graft plug: Clinical and radiographic outcomes from a randomized clinical trial

BDS, DSc,
BDS, MSc,
BDS, MSc,
BDS,
BDS,
BDS, MPH, DScD, and
BDS, MPH, DrPH
Article Category: Research Article
DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00005
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

Various grafting materials have been used for alveolar ridge preservation, with varying degrees of success in maintaining ridge dimensions. This study compared the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a composite graft plug containing bioactive, resorbable calcium apatite crystals embedded in a collagen matrix with those of a corticocancellous allograft. This randomized clinical trial included 24 participants requiring single-rooted tooth extractions. The participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: composite plug or allograft. Clinical measurements of soft tissue thickness were obtained at baseline and four months post-extraction using a stent, with reference points at 4, 7, and 10 mm apical to the gingival margin of the tooth to be extracted. Furthermore, radiographic assessments were conducted using cone-beam computed tomography at the same reference points. The results revealed significant increases in soft-tissue thickness in both groups, with the composite plug group showing a greater increase. Radiographic analysis indicated greater reductions in bone width in the composite plug group across all horizontal measurement levels than in the allograft group. The differences in alveolar ridge width reduction between the groups were 1.36 mm, 1.3 mm, and 1 mm at the specified reference points. However, the composite plug performed better than the allograft in maintaining vertical height. In conclusion, within the limitations of this study, socket preservation using allografts combined with a collagen plug appears to be more effective than composite graft plugs for preserving ridge width.

Copyright: 2025

Contributor Notes

Corresponding Author: Arwa Badahdah Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia P.O. Box 80498, Ahmad Altaybee Street, Jeddah-21589, Saudi Arabia Email: aabadahdah@kau.edu.sa

The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this article.

  • Download PDF