Regenerative Treatment of Peri-Implantitis Following Implant Surface Decontamination With Titanium Brush and Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy: A Case Series With Reentry

Figure 1. Clinical view of treatment progression in case 1. (a) Intrasurgical view of the peri-implant defects in positions 30 and 31 at T0, (b) Intrasurgical view of the residual peri-implant defects at T1. A supracrestal component is still visible associated with a dehiscence-type defect configuration. Figure 2. Clinical view of treatment progression in case 2. (a) Intrasurgical view of the peri-implant defects in positions 18 and 19 at T0. (b) Intrasurgical view of the residual peri-implant defects at T1. A supracrestal component of approximately 1 mm is visible around both implant necks associated with a dehiscence defect extended at the top of the first visible implant thread at the buccal aspect of implant 19. Figure 3. Clinical view of treatment progression in case 3. (a) Intrasurgical view of the peri-implant defect in position 8 at T0. (b) Intrasurgical view of the regenerated peri-implant defect at T1.

Figure 4. Clinical view of treatment progression in case 4. (a) Intrasurgical view of the peri-implant defects in positions 2 and 3 at T0. (b) Intrasurgical view of the regenerated peri-implant defects at T1. A dehiscence-type defect exposing the machined collar is visible at the buccal aspect of implant 3. Figure 5. Clinical view of treatment progression in case 5. (a) Intrasurgical view of the peri-implant defects in positions 2, 3, and 4 at T0. (b) Intrasurgical view of the regenerated peri-implant defects at T1. Figure 6. Clinical view of treatment progression in case 6. (a) Intrasurgical view of the peri-implant defect in position 12 at T0. (b) Intrasurgical view of the regenerated peri-implant defect at T1.
Contributor Notes