Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 06 Jan 2020

Effects of Ultraviolet Photoactivation on Osseointegration of Commercial Pure Titanium Dental Implant After 8 Weeks in a Rabbit Model

MD, PhD,
DDS,
MD,
BDS, PhD,
MDSc, and
MD, PhD
Page Range: 101 – 107
DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00122
Save
Download PDF

This study investigated whether a 6-Watt ultraviolet C-lamp was capable of producing photofunctionalization on commercial implants during a medium observation term of 8 weeks. A total of 20 implants were inserted in 5 New Zealand rabbits, with each animal receiving 2 implants per tibia (one photofunctionalized and one untreated), according to a previously established randomization sequence. All implants were inserted by a single surgeon following the manufacturer's instructions. Histological analysis was performed by an evaluator who was blinded to the treatment condition. After 8 weeks of healing, the 2 groups showed no statistically significant differences in terms of bone-to-implant contact. Compared to control implants, the photofunctionalized implants showed improved wettability and more homogenous results. Within the limits of the present study, the use of this 6-W ultraviolet C-lamp, for an irradiation time of 15 minutes at a distance of 15 cm, did not improve the percentages of bone-to-implant contact in rabbits at an osseointegration time of 8 weeks.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

A micro-pipette was used to place 10-μL drops of bidistilled water on untreated and photofunctionalized implants. (a) Poor wettability (<90°) on the untreated implant. (b) Good wettability (>90°) on the photofunctionalized implant.


Figure 2 and 3.
Figure 2 and 3.

(a) Upon insertion of a photofunctionalized implant, blood rapidly reached the coronal zone. (b) Upon insertion of an untreated implant, blood only moisturized the area in contact with the cortical bone.

Figure 3 . Insertion of a photofunctionalized implant, along with a non-photofunctionalized implant. The hydrophilicity of the photofunctionalized implant can be observed.


Figure 4.
Figure 4.

(a) Sagittal section of the implant. (b) ×10 magnification image. Red lines indicate bone-implant contact, yellow line indicates the area without contact, and orange horizontal line indicates the separation between the cortical and medullar bone.


Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Box plot of the total bone-to-implant contact obtained with control and ultraviolet-C-treated surfaces. Plots show the lower (Q1), median (Q2), and upper (Q3) quartiles. The whiskers indicate the highest and lowest observations. BIC indicates bone to implant contact.


Contributor Notes

Corresponding author, e-mail: arturosa@um.es
  • Download PDF