Editorial Type:
Article Category: Letter
| Online Publication Date: 01 Oct 2019
Tapered Screw Implants With Different Machined Neck Designs: A 3-Year Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Prospective Study
Tapered Screw Implants With Different Machined Neck Designs: A 3-Year Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Prospective Study
DDS, MSc, PhD,
MD, DDS, MSc,
BSc, and
DDS, MSc, PhD
Page Range: 416 – 420

(a) Implant placement in the control group (CAM-). (b) Implant placement in the test group (CAM+).

(a) Healing abutments screwed to the control implants (CAM-). (b) Healing abutments screwed to the test implants (CAM+).

Marginal bone resorption differences between the means of the control (CAM-) and test (CAM+) implants adjusted for the subject from the delivery of the temporary prosthesis (T0) to 36 months postloading. The red line illustrates the overall mean of the differences within subjects between CAM- and CAM+ implants weighted for the number of implants; the black lines represent the difference within subjects of the two mean values between CAM- and CAM+ implants in each subject.
Contributor Notes
*
Corresponding author, e-mail: pierpaolo_poli@fastwebnet.it