Editorial Type:
Article Category: Other
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Jun 2015

Case Studies on the Use of Skeletal Anchorage Orthodontic Techniques Prior to Prosthetic Rehabilitation

MSc, PhD,
MSc,
,
MSc, PhDc, and
MSc, PhDc
Page Range: 332 – 336
DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00152
Save
Download PDF
<bold>
  <sc>Figures 1–3.</sc>
</bold>
Figures 1–3.

Figure 1. Anchorage systems. (a) Mini-implant. (b) Mini-plates. Figure 2. Model analysis. (a) Right side. (b) Left side. Figure 3. Frontal view of the orthodontic intervention with mini-implants in both sides of maxilla.


<bold>
  <sc>Figures 4–8.</sc>
</bold>
Figures 4–8.

Figure 4. Lateral view of the interoclusal space available after orthodontic intrusion. (a) Right side. (b) Left side. Figure 5. Frontal view of the rehabilitation in the posterior region of mandibular arch. Figure 6. Frontal view of the model analysis in the anterior region of maxilla. Figure 7. Frontal view of the clinical evaluation. Figure 8. Interoclusal space available after the prosthetic abutments selection.


<bold>
  <sc>Figures 9–13.</sc>
</bold>
Figures 9–13.

Figure 9. Frontal view of the final rehabilitation. Figure 10. Initial clinical examination. (a) Frontal view. (b) Lateral view of the region with interoclusal space deficiency. Figure 11. Lateral view of the miniplate 7 days after installation. Figure 12. Lateral view of the interocclusal space obtained after skeletal anchorage with miniplate. Figure 13. Lateral view of the final rehabilitation.


Contributor Notes

Corresponding author, e-mail: fernanda.faot@gmail.com
  • Download PDF