Editorial Type:
Article Category: Other
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Apr 2015

One-Year Prospective Study of 7-mm-Long Implants in the Mandible: Installation Technique and Crown/Implant Ratio of 1.5 or Less

DDS, PhD,
DDS, PhD,
DDS, PhD,
DDS, PhD,
DDS, and
DDS
Page Range: e30 – e35
DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00162
Save
Download PDF

This study prospectively evaluated the clinical prognoses of short implants (7-mm long) in the mandible. We investigated the clinical prognosis of short implants in 20 patients (46 implants) according to the installation technique (submerged or nonsubmerged), installation depth (5.5-mm depth, 7-mm depth), and crown/implant ratio. We investigated the marginal bone loss and peri-implant soft-tissue index 12 months after the final prosthetic delivery. Twelve months after prosthetic delivery, no statistically significant differences were observed in bone loss in relation to the type of installation technique, installation depth, or crown/implant ratio. The plaque index and pocket depth indexes were not influenced by the installation technique, installation depth, or crown/implant ratio. We observed marginal bone loss of 3.3 mm in 1 implant from the nonsubmerged group. The total 1-year success rate was 97.83%. Based on this 1-year success rate, short implants had a good clinical prognosis, regardless of the installation technique, installation depth, or crown/implant ratio.

<bold>
  <sc>Figure 1</sc>
</bold>
.
Figure 1 .

A Superline short implant of 7 mm in length.


<bold>
  <sc>Figure 2</sc>
</bold>
.
Figure 2 .

Two types of installation depths are available. (a) The height of the smooth surface collar is 1.5 mm. The length of the rough surface fixture is 5.5 mm. (b) For the 5.5-mm depth placement, the entire collar was exposed above the alveolar crest. (c) For the 7-mm full-length placement, the top of the collar coincided with the alveolar crest.


Contributor Notes

Corresponding author, e-mail: kyk0505@snubh.org
  • Download PDF