Editorial Type:
Article Category: Other
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Apr 2015

An Alternative Approach Sequence to Early Implant Placement and Bone Grafting Over Upper Incisor Traumatic Loss in a Malocclusion Patient

,
,
,
, and
Page Range: 214 – 218
DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00316
Save
Download PDF
<bold>Figures 1–3</bold>
.
Figures 1–3 .

Figure 1. Tooth 11 loss caused by dental trauma Intraoral (frontal view) at the first visit to the hospital. Figure 2. Initial periapical radiograph. Figure 3. Initial panoramic radiograph.


<bold>Figures 4 and 5.</bold>
Figures 4 and 5.

Figure 4. Intraoral view of the upper and lower dentition. Figure 5. Temporary resin bonded bridge for tooth 11.


<bold>Figures 6–10</bold>
.
Figures 6–10 .

Figure 6. Periapical radiograph taken after placing the implant. Figure 7. (a) Horizontal bony destruction over buccal bone. (b) Autogenous bone chips and a low-substitution bone filler with a resorbable collagen membrane were applied to augment the implant site. Figure 8. Screw-retained provisional crown for soft tissue conditioning. Figure 9. Extraction of tooth 42. Level and alignment stage of the orthodontic treatment. Figure 10. Tooth stripping and enameloplasty was performed.


<bold>Figures 11–15</bold>
.
Figures 11–15 .

Figure 11. Width/length ratio of upper central incisor = 0.78. Figure 12. Esthetic score (PES/WES) of tooth 11 final restoration was 16. Figure 13. Two-year follow-up after delivery revealed a stable esthetic treatment outcome. Figure 14. Periapical radiograph taken at 2 years' follow-up. Figure 15. The black line represents the tooth contour before orthodontic therapy, and the green line represents the tooth contour after orthodontic therapy.


Contributor Notes

Corresponding author, e-mail: tnwuvghks@gmail.com
  • Download PDF