Digital Implant Planning for a Minimally Invasive Surgery Approach: A Case Letter of a Full-Arch Rehabilitation

Figure 1. Scan appliance. Denture with radiographic markers used as reference points to superimpose dual-scan images. Figure 2. Computerized tomography data integration. Three-dimensional view of jawbone and scan appliance after dual-scan data realignment. Figures 3–5. Prosthetically driven implant planning. Virtual placement of implants and design of surgical template in 3-dimensional views. Figure 6. Prosthetically driven implant planning. Cross-sectional view of implant planning processing data.

Figures 7–8. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing–fabricated surgical template. Figure 7. Surgical template positioned intraorally. Figure 8. Drilling sleeves' particular. Figures 9–10. Implant placement. Figure 9. Osteotomy site preparation. Figure 10. implant positioning. Figures 11–12. Postoperative intraoral view. Flapless implant placement completed, after surgical template removal.

Figure 13. Immediate prosthetic outcome. Postoperative view of immediate loaded fiber-reinforced composite screwed prosthesis. Figures 14–15. Follow-up. Figure 14. Clinical 1-year follow-up. Figure 15. Radiographic 1-year follow-up. Note the optimal soft-tissue healing and the peri-implant bone stability.