Editorial Type:
Article Category: Other
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Oct 2014

Efficacy of Growth Factor in Promoting Early Osseointegration

DDS, MSc,
DDS,
DMD, MS, DMSc,
DDS, MMSc, and
DDS, DMSc
Page Range: 543 – 548
DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00304
Save
Download PDF

A preclinical study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of 2 different topical formulations of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB (rhPDGF-BB) to promote early osseointegration and enhanced bone-to-implant contact (BIC) for dental implants placed in an edentulous ridge. Six female beagle dogs were divided into 3 groups. The control group included 4 implants with no coating; test group A included 10 implants with commercially available rhPDGF-BB formulation coating; and second test group B included 10 implants with prototype viscous rhPDGF-BB coating. Three dogs were sacrificed at 3 weeks (12 implants) and the remaining 3 dogs at 6 weeks after implant placement (12 implants). The specimens were retrieved for histological evaluation, and revealed an uneventful healing of all implants without any sign of an inflammatory response at the different time intervals. Furthermore, the bone was in very close contact with the implants' surfaces with no evidence of intervening fibrous tissue layers. At 3 weeks, new bone formation between most implant threads on rhPDGF-BB coated implants was evident, whereas in the control group only a thin and sparse amount of new bone was noted. At 6 weeks, the commercially available rhPDGF-BB formulation coated implant group (Group A) showed more trabecular bone and higher BIC compared to the other 2 groups. Histologically, the results in this study showed that use of conventionally available rhPDGF-BB formulation as the implant surface treatment may accelerate the process of osseointegration and enhance BIC.

<bold>
  <sc>Figure 1</sc>
  .
</bold>
Figure 1 .

Periapical radiograph taken immediately after the surgery (a) and 6 weeks after the surgery for group A (b).


<bold>
  <sc>Figure 2</sc>
  .
</bold>
Figure 2 .

At 3 weeks post-implant placement, more bone-to-implant contact for the test group A (b) compared to the control group (a).


<bold>
  <sc>Figure 3</sc>
  .
</bold>
Figure 3 .

At 6 weeks post-implant placement, more trabecular bone and significant BIC can be seen in both test group A (b) and test group B (c) compared to the control group (a).


Contributor Notes

Corresponding author, e-mail: dkim@hsdm.harvard.edu
  • Download PDF