Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla With Pterygoid Implants: A Review
The purpose of this article is to review the literature published and to assess the success of treatment of patients with atrophic posterior maxilla with pterygoid implants. Studies from 1992 to 2009 on patients with atrophic posterior maxilla rehabilitated with pterygoid implants were reviewed. Those reporting clinical series of at least 5 patients with atrophic posterior maxilla (Class IV and V of Cawood and Howell), rehabilitated with pterygoid implants and fixed prosthesis, and with 12 months minimum follow-up were included. In each study the following were assessed: number of patients, number of implants, surgical technique, prosthetic rehabilitation, success rate, bone loss, complications and patient satisfaction. Thirteen articles were included, reporting a total of 1053 pterygoid implants in 676 patients. The weighted average success of pterygoid implants was 90.7%; bone loss evaluated radiographically ranged between 0 and 4.5 mm. No additional complications compared with conventional implants were found, and patient satisfaction level with the prosthesis was high. Pterygoid implants have high success rates, similar bone loss levels to those of conventional implants, minimal complications and good acceptance by patients, being therefore an alternative to treat patients with atrophic posterior maxilla. Two anatomical locations in which implants are placed in the retromolar area can be distinguished: the pterygoid process and the pterygomaxillary region. Implant lengths and angulations vary between these two techniques.

An implant in the pterygoid process. Figure 2. An implant in the pterygomaxillary region. Figure 3. Use of an osteotome to create the implant bed in the pterygiod process.

(a) Orthopantomogram showing the maxillary sinus and the atrophic alveolar ridge. (b) Use of an osteotome to create the implant bed. (c) Implants in the pterygoid process. Orthopantomogram after placement of the implants. (d) Occlusal view of the sites of implants 1 month after surgery. (e) Orthopantomogram after placement of the prosthesis.

Use of a curve osteotome to place implants in pterygomaxillary region. Figure 6. (a) Orthopantomogram showing the maxillary sinus and the atrophic alveolar ridge. (b) Placement of pterygomaxillary implants. (c) Occlusal view of the sites of implants 1 month after surgery. (d) A cemented fixed partial prosthesis is placed. (e) Pterygomaxillary implants. Orthopantomogram after placement of the prosthesis.
Contributor Notes