Editorial Type:
Article Category: Other
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Dec 2012

Lateral Augmentation of the Maxilla and Mandible Using Framework Technique With Allogeneic Bone Grafts

Dr.med.dent and
Dr.med, Dr.med.dent
Page Range: 661 – 667
DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00073
Save
Download PDF

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of lateral ridge augmentation in 36 patients with severely atrophic alveolar ridge using allogeneic bone grafts in a framework technique. A thinned allogeneic cortical graft was screwed to the alveolar ridge, leaving a hollow space that was filled with particulated allogeneic cortical bone. Thirty-six patients who received surgical lateral block augmentation using allogeneic bone grafts were involved in this study. Implants were placed in a second session after a mean time of 6.3 months. The surgical technique and the reasons for failure of surgery in three patients are described. Additionally, properties of allogeneic bone grafts are reviewed. In 33 patients, dental implants were successfully installed and continued to be well maintained at the last follow-up (91.7% success). In three patients, dental implants could not be installed (8.3% failure) as the graft was lost because of wound dehiscence; however, repeat surgery was successfully carried out in all three. The use of allogeneic bone grafts in lateral ridge augmentation of the maxilla and mandible showed successful clinical results. It seems to be a reliable material for reconstructing a severely atrophic alveolar ridge. It presents a good alternative to autogenous bone regarding augmentation because it offers good ossification, less morbidity, unlimited availability and shorter duration of surgery, and lower costs.

Copyright: 2012
<bold>
  <sc>Figures 1–4.</sc>
</bold>
Figures 1–4.

Figure 1. Crestal incision of the alveolar ridge of the lower jaw and exposure of bone. Figure 2. Thinned and contoured allogeneic cortical graft with perforations for fixation screws. Figure 3. Particulated cortical graft mixed with venous blood. Figure 4. Cortical frame with particulated graft fixed with screws to the alveolar ridge.


<bold>
  <sc>Figures 5–8.</sc>
</bold>
Figures 5–8.

Figure 5. Preoperative cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) of the mandible (axial view). Figure 6. Postoperative CBCT of the mandible (axial view). Figure 7. CBCT after installation of implants (axial view). Figure 8. Example of an extensive augmentation of the lower jaw.


Contributor Notes

Corresponding author, e-mail: wallowy@dorow-clinic.de
  • Download PDF