Editorial Type:
Article Category: Other
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Aug 2012

The Incidence of Maxillary Sinus Membrane Perforation During Endoscopically Assessed Crestal Sinus Floor Elevation: A Pilot Study

DDS,
DMD, FAAID,
MD,
DDS, MS,
MD,
DDS, MPH, MS, and
DDS, MS, PhD
Page Range: 345 – 359
DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00083
Save
Download PDF

Transcrestal sinus membrane elevation is a surgical procedure performed to increase the bone volume in the maxillary sinus cavity. Because of visual limitations, the potential for maxillary sinus membrane perforations may be greater than with the lateral approach technique. The aim of this study was to macroscopically investigate ex vivo the occurrence of sinus membrane perforation during surgery using 3 transcrestal sinus floor elevation methods. Twenty fresh human cadaver heads, with 40 intact sinuses, were used for simultaneous sinus membrane elevation, placement of graft material, and dental implants. Real-time sinus endoscopy, periapical digital radiographs, and cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) images were subsequently used to evaluate the outcome of each surgical procedure. Perforation rates for each of the 3 techniques were then compared using a significance level of P < .05. No statistically significant differences in the perforation rate (P = .79) were found among the 3 surgical techniques. Although the sinus endoscope noted a higher frequency of perforations at the time of implant placement as compared with instrumentation or graft insertion, the difference was not statistically significant (P = .04). The CBCT readings were judged to be more accurate for identifying evidence of sinus perforations than the periapical radiographs when compared with the direct visualization with the endoscope. This pilot study demonstrated that a sinus membrane perforation can occur at any time during the sinus lift procedure, independent of the surgical method used.

Copyright: 2012
<bold>
  <sc>Figure 1.</sc>
</bold>
Figure 1.

Summers' modified diagrams illustrating sinus floor upfracture using osteotomes penetrating the sinus cavity.


<bold>
  <sc>Figure 2.</sc>
</bold>
Figure 2.

Dask crestal bone planing antrostomy images. (a) Surgical drill with stopper, reaching the sinus boundary, eliminating the cortical bony floor, and displacing the maxillary sinus membrane by mechanical and hydraulic pressure. (b) Millimetric dome curette detecting the sinus floor landmark and recording the elevation height at the center of osteotomy. (c) Graft placement. (d) Implant placement at bone level.


<bold>
  <sc>Figures 3.</sc>
</bold>
<bold>
  <sc>and</sc>
</bold>
<bold>4</bold>
.
Figures 3. and 4 .

Figure 3. Diagram with Implantium convex osteotomes infracturing the sinus floor. Figure 4. Illustration of the nasal surgical endoscopic access. (a) Nonoperated intact sinus complex. (b) Endoscopic operated side for direct access to the maxillary sinus cavity.


<bold>
  <sc>Figure</sc>
  5.
</bold>
Figure 5.

(a) Illustration of nasal endoscopy. (b) Video capture of sinus membrane perforation without loss of dome effect or graft displacement. (c) Video capture of sinus membrane elevation without perforation. (d) Postoperative endoscopic video capture showing a thin intact sinus membrane in contact with the implant apex.


<bold>
  <sc>Figure 6.</sc>
</bold>
Figure 6.

Example of image correlation for evaluators (cone-beam computerized tomography, periapical radiograph, and endoscopic video capture).


Contributor Notes

Corresponding author, e-mail: agarbacea@llu.edu
  • Download PDF