Editorial Type:
Article Category: Other
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Aug 2012

Si and Ca Individually and Combinatorially Target Enhanced MC3T3-E1 Subclone 4 Early Osteogenic Marker Expression

,
,
,
,
, and
Page Range: 325 – 336
DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00108
Save
Download PDF

This study tests the hypothesis that silicon and calcium ions combinatorially target gene expression during osteoblast differentiation. MC3T3-E1 subclone 4 osteoblast progenitors (transformed mouse calvarial osteoblasts) were exposed to Si4+ (from Na2SiO3) and Ca2+ (from CaCl2:H2O) ion treatments both individually (0.4 mM each + control treatment) and combinatorially (0.4 mM Si4+ + 0.4 mM Ca2+ + control treatment) and compared to control treated (α-minimum essential medium, 10% fetal bovine serum, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin) cells. Cell proliferation studies showed no significant increase in cell density between treatments over 5 days of culture. Cellular differentiation studies involved addition of ascorbic acid (50 mg/L) for all treatments. Relative gene expression was determined for collagen type 1 (Col(I)α1/Col(I)α2), core-binding factor a (cbfa1/Runx2), and osteocalcin (OCN), which indicated osteoblast progenitor differentiation into a mineralizing phenotype. Increased Si4+ or Ca2+ ion treatments enhanced Col(I)α1, Col(I)α2, Runx2, and OCN expression, while increased Si4+ + Ca2+ ion treatments enhanced OCN expression. Moreover, it was found that a Si4+/Ca2+ ratio of unity was optimal for maximal expression of OCN. Collagen fiber bundles were dense, elongated, and thick within extracellular matrices (ECM) exposed to Si4+ and Si4+ + Ca2+ treatments, while collagen fiber bundles were sparse, short, and thin within Ca2+ and control treated ECM. These results indicated that individual ions enhance multiple osteogenic gene expression, while combined ion treatments enhance individual gene expression. In addition, these results indicated that Si4+ enhanced osteoblast gene expression and ECM formation at higher levels than Ca2+. These results support the larger concept that ions (possibly released from bioactive glasses) could control bone formation by targeting osteoblast marker expression.

Copyright: 2012
<bold>
  <sc>Figures</sc>
  1–5.
</bold>
Figures 1–5.

Figure 1. Effect of Si, Ca, and Si + Ca ion treatments on MC3T3-E1 subclone 4 proliferation (ANOVA, P > .05). Figure 2. Effect of Si and Ca ions on MC3T3-E1 subclone 4 expression of collagen type 1 [Col(I)α1] after 1 and 6 days of culture. *indicates statistical significance relative to control, ANOVA, P < .05. Figure 3. Figure 4. Effect of Si and Ca ions on MC3T3-E1 subclone 4 expression of collagen type 1 [Col(I)α2] after 1 and 6 days of culture. *indicates statistical significance relative to control, ANOVA, P < .05. Figure 5. Effect of Si and Ca ions on MC3T3-E1 subclone 4 expression of osteocalcin after 1 and 6 days of culture. *indicates statistical significance relative to control, ANOVA, P < .05.


<bold>
  <sc>Figure</sc>
  6.
</bold>
Figure 6.

Effect of individual ion (0.4 mM Si + control + AA [a], 0.4 mM Ca + control + AA [b]), and combined ion (0.4 mM Si + 0.4 mM Ca + control + AA [c]), and control (+ AA [d]) treatments on MC3T3-E1 subclone 4 collagen fiber bundle formation after 6 days of culture. (Elongated fiber bundles indicated with orange stars.) Collagen fiber bundle counts [e] confirmed more elongated fiber bundles in the treatments incorporating Si as compared to the treatments that did not incorporate Si.


<bold>
  <sc>Figure</sc>
  7.
</bold>
Figure 7.

Effect of Si and Ca ions on MC3T3-E1 subclone 4 expression of osteocalcin after 1 and 6 days of culture. *indicates statistical significance relative to control, ANOVA, P < .05.


Contributor Notes

Corresponding author, e-mail: venu.varanasi@ucsf.edu
  • Download PDF