Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Dec 2009

Force and Movement of Non-Osseointegrated Implants: An In Vitro Study

DDS,
PhD,
, and
Page Range: 270 – 276
DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336-35.6.270
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

Dental implants have enabled a dramatic increase in the quality of life for many partially edentulous and edentulous patents. Immediate loading of newly placed dental implants is a recent advancement that attempts to meet patient demand. However, immediate loading of a just placed implant may induce implant failure to osseointegrate. Some patients can generate a biting force that can reach approximately 1300 Newtons (N) in the posterior jaws. The magnitude of bite force that would cause failure of osseointegration of newly placed implants is currently unknown. It has been proposed that osseointegration would fail if an implant is luxated in bone more than 50 to 150 microns. Fibrous tissue, not bone, would form. This study investigated the quantity of various off-axial forces required to move a nonosseointegrated 4.3 × 13 mm implant 50 microns. The previously published pilot study for this study found that the amount of horizontal force required to displace an implant 50 microns was approximately 150 N. This study found that the force needed to move the implants 100 microns at a horizontal approach, 0 degrees, averaged 50 N, with a range of 23–79 N; at 22 degrees, averaged 52 N, with a range of 27–70 N; and at 60 degrees averaged 87 N, with a range of 33–105 N.

Copyright: 2009 by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Figure 1
Figure 1

Figure 1. Implants were placed in bovine ramus for testing.


Figure 7–9
Figure 7–9

Figure 7. (a) Force and displacement transducers. (b) Wiring diagram. Figure 8. Closer view of assembled testing apparatus. Figure 9. Positioning of displacement transducer and push rod on implant.


Figure 10–14
Figure 10–14

Figure 10. Results from a typical test. Figure 11. Force to move 100 µm vs angle of applied force scatter plot. Figure 12. (a) and (b) Force vs displacement vs angle surface plot (2 views). Figure 13. Displacement-thickness correlation (200 N). Figure 14. (Compare with Figure 11.) 100 µm displacement correlations.


Figure 2–6
Figure 2–6

FIGURE 2. Front view of positioning device. FIGURE 3. Side view of positioning device. FIGURE 4. Vise for holding the bovine ramus. FIGURE 5. Adjustable clamp. FIGURE 6. Assembled testing apparatus.


Contributor Notes

Dennis Flanagan, DDS, Horea Ilies, PhD, Brian Lasko and Jeffrey Stack are at the Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Conn. Address correspondence to Dr Flanagan at 1671 West Main Street, Willimantic, CT 06226. (e‐mail: dffdds@charter.net)

  • Download PDF