Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Feb 2008

Immediate Flapless Implant Placement and Provisionalization: Challenge for Optimum Esthetics and Function: A Case Report

DDS,
DDS, MS,
DDS, and
DDS
Page Range: 52 – 58
DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336(2008)34[52:IFIPAP]2.0.CO;2
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

This report presents a case of tooth extraction and immediate flapless implant placement followed by fabrication of transitional restoration. The tooth was extracted atraumatically with the use of a periotome followed by careful debridement. An osteotomy was performed up to 5 mm beyond the base of the socket and depth using the alveolar crest as a landmark, following a slightly palatal direction. The implant shoulder was inserted 3 mm below the cementoenamel junction of the adjacent tooth. The interproximal distance from the neighboring teeth was 3 mm. No membranes and/or grafts were used. Initial impressions were taken immediately after implant placement; 6 hours later a well-polished and slightly overcontoured (at the distal-mesial aspect) acrylic crown was fixed onto the implant. There were no contacts in the centric and lateral positions. Five months later, the occlusion was modified allowing slight contacts in the centric position for an additional 2 months. The final prosthetic restoration was placed 2 months later (7 months after surgery), consisting of a full ceramic crown cemented on a customized metal ceramic UCLA abutment. The technique maintained the integrity of hard and soft tissues and created a very favorable esthetic result. It also provided the patient with a transitional fixed restoration and reduced the time required for therapy completion. Because research on this field is limited, further investigation is required to support the results of this report, despite the promising clinical outcome

Copyright: American Academy of Implant Dentistry
Figures 1
Figures 1

and 2. Figure 1. Clinical outcome after immediate implant placement. Figure 2. Clinical outcome after delayed implant placement.



Figures 8
Figures 8

and 9. Figure 8. Permanent full ceramic crown 12 months after implant placement. Figure 9. Radiographic picture 12 months after implant placement.


Contributor Notes

Ch. Angelopoulos, DDS, MS, is an assistant professor in the Department of Oral Pathology, Radiology, and Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Dentistry. Address correspondence to Dr Stelios Karamanis, G.Papazoli 3, 546 30 -Thessaloniki, Greece. (karamaniss@yahoo.gr)

S. Karamanis, DDS, is a teaching assistant, D. Tsoukalas, DDS, is a lecturer, and N. Parissis, DDS, is an associate professor in the Department of Dentoalveolar/Implant Surgery and Radiology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Dentistry, Greece.

  • Download PDF