Implant Biomechanics in Grafted Sinus: A Finite Element Analysis
This in vitro study investigated the stress distribution in the bone surrounding an implant that is placed in a posterior edentulous maxilla with a sinus graft. The standard threaded implant and anatomy of the crestal cortical bone, cancellous bone, sinus floor cortical bone, and grafted bone were represented in the 3-dimensional finite element models. The thickness of the crestal cortical bone and stiffness of the graft were varied in the models to simulate different clinical scenarios, representing variation in the anatomy and graft quality. Axial and lateral loads were considered and the stresses developed in the supporting structures were analyzed. The finite element models showed different stress patterns associated with helical threads. The von Mises stress distribution indicated that stress was maximal around the top of the implant with varying intensities in both loading cases. The stress was highest in the cortical bone, lower in the grafted bone, and lowest in the cancellous bone. When the stiffness of the grafted bone approximated the cortical bone, axial loading resulted in stress reduction in all the native bone layers; however, lateral loading produced stress reduction in only the cancellous bone. When the stiffness of the graft was less than that of the cancellous bone, the graft assumed a lesser proportion of axial loads. Thus, it caused a concomitant stress increase in all the native bones, whereas this phenomenon was observed in only the cancellous bone with lateral loading. The crestal cortical bone, though receiving the highest intensity stresses, affected the overall stress distribution less than the grafted bone. The stress from the lateral load was up to 11 times higher than that of the axial load around the implant. These findings suggest that the type of loading affects the load distribution more than the variations in bone, and native bone is the primary supporting structure.Abstract

Cross section of alveolar bone (AB) with sinus base (SB) and walls (SW) in the posterior maxilla from human cadaver

(A) Self-tapping implant, isometric view. (B) Posterior maxilla model. (C) Implant inserted, front view. (D) Implant inserted, side view

300 N equivalent force and moment. (A) Axial loading. (B) Lateral loading

von Mises stress (N/mm2) distribution for axial loading. (A) Strong graft with thick crest. (B) Weak graft with thick crest. (C) Strong graft with thin crest. (D) Weak graft with thin crest

von Mises stress (N/mm2) distribution for lateral loading. (A) Strong graft with thick crest. (B) Weak graft with thick crest. (C) Strong graft with thin crest. (D) Weak graft with thin crest
Contributor Notes
Mete I. Fanuscu, DDS, is an assistant professor and director of Advanced Education in General Dentistry, Division of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles. Address correspondence to Dr Fanuscu at UCLA School of Dentistry, CHS, 20-114, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095 (mfanuscu@ucla.edu).
Hung V. Vu, DDS, PhD, is a professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, California State University, Long Beach, and is a clinical assistant professor of Orthodontics, Division of Craniofacial Sciences and Therapeutics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Bernard Poncelet, MS, is a mechanical engineer for Orthodyne Electronics, Irvine, California.